The systematic review is a style of paper writing that explains the contradictions, differences, gaps, and directions of future studies by searching for and identifying related articles on a specific topic. Numerous empirical research ideas come from literature systematic review articles because they examine a large volume of articles over a period of time based on unique protocols. These articles are a solid stepping stone for the growth and development of science in that field and determine the path of researchers’ progress through effective screening. Today, to a large extent, there are review articles in every field, and it can be said with certainty that no field is without the need for such research. Many reputable journals devote at least one issue a year to review articles.
It is true that the data of a literature review are articles published in each field, but they must also take the same important steps as a professional research. An important question is why the research question should be answered through a literature review and what contribution it makes. But the most important feature of a literature review is identifying gaps in the past, plotting the current position of the variable in the field at present, and directing junior researchers to fill gaps and make contributions.
A systematic review article can be expanded using 40–50 to 500 or more relevant papers and cover a minimum of 10 years (Paul & Criado, 2020). Of course, the literature review can also be performed using statistical methods and techniques called a meta-analysis.
For journals covered by Research Hub LLC, the value of a literature systematic review article is no different from an empirical sample and they have an equal chance of being published. What is important is to fill in the gaps and directions that, theoretically and methodologically, can create value and contribute to each discipline.